Honey Hill
Honey Hill
|
|
Honey Hill $4.99 We believe it is important to preserve what makes music special, and make it easy to craft listening experiences. At MOG, browse millions songs and play them instantly. Or just turn on radio where you can stop and replay songs. You can also create playlists for any occasion, and even download songs to your mobile. We are dedicated to employing the cleanest but most powerful technology so you can enjoy music as much as ever. |
|
|
Honey Hill Magnetic Theatre $23.43 No Synopsis Available |
|
|
Hillsdale Pacifico Round Dining Table, 48-Inch Diameter Table Top, Black with Coppered Highlights and Honey Maple $258.99 Finish:Black/Copper/Honey Maple Black metal with copper highlights mix with wood finished in a honey maple tone to accomplish the cool, refreshing look of Hillsdale’s Pacifico dining collection. A generous 48 round table top is supported by a unique base built with interlocking half spheres. Clean lines with just enough curve, versatile beige microfiber cushioned seats, and neutral finishes make t… |
|
|
Hillsdale Pacifico Round 5-Piece Dining Set, Black with Copper Highlights and Honey Maple, Set Includes 1-Table and 4-Chairs $606.21 Finish:Black/Copper/Honey Maple, Chair Quantity:4 Chairs Black metal with copper highlights mix with wood finished in a honey maple tone to accomplish the cool, refreshing look of Hillsdale’s Pacifico dining collection. A generous 48 round table top is supported by a unique base built with interlocking half spheres. Clean lines with just enough curve, versatile beige microfiber cushioned seats, an… |
|
|
Hillsdale Pacifico Dining Side Chair, Black with Coppered Highlights and Honey Maple, Set of 2 $197.04 Finish:Black/Copper/Honey Maple Black metal with copper highlights mix with wood finished in a honey maple tone to accomplish the cool, refreshing look of Hillsdale’s Pacifico dining collection. Clean lines with just enough curve, versatile beige microfiber cushioned seats, and neutral finishes make this transitionally designed dining ensemble perfect for your dining room or eat in kitchen. Const… |
|
|
Shania Twain – Greatest Hits $7.05 Shania Twain–recluse, happily married, mother of one–has sold more than 40 million albums with flirty, hook-laden, beat-heavy, country-tinged pop that has all the subtlety of a musical wet T-shirt contest, yet is as irresistible as Swiss chocolate and Pringles. There are a few heartfelt, moon-in-June love ballads on this generous and long-awaited 20-song collection, which includes three new song… |
They Attract Users And, Just As Importantly, Their Private Information, Which In Its Turn Allows Corporations Like Google And Facebook To Sell Advertising.
Free services are a sort of honey pot for web services. They attract users and, more importantly, their private data, which in its turn allows firms like Google and Facebook to sell advertising.
A large amount of users, when they even consider the exchange, treat the advertising as a minor nuisance. They may point to TV and note that our TV broadcasting system was built on advertising, so why don't you use advertising to fund cloud-based info services?
The issue is that info isn't TV. TV was important but advertisers had little effect on anything aside from possibly dumbing down the content of the shows themselves. However , the integrity of private and commercial info is critical to the working of the modern economy and the need for advertising has a selection of toxic effects on the info services provided to customers.
In my Cost of Lost Privacy series, I highlighted the indirect effect of corporations like Google using that private data and behavior promoting to allow advertisers like subprime lenders to live on exposed populations and increase business inequality. But advertising has a less convoluted effect that makes most online info services less functional for all users and doubtless toxic in their wider effects on data protection and the infrastructure of the web itself.
Deliberate Absence of Security in Information Services : The need to collect user information to share it with advertisers means that online firms deliberately avoid encryption and other measures that would better protect user data. After technology analyst Chris Soghoian released a New York Times op-ed noting that most correspondents did not recognise the lack of security in web services, Google's top D.C. Privacy lobbyist, William DeVries, wrote on his very own Google+ page that Chris was "dead right. Writers (and bloggers, and small companies) need to take a couple of hours and learn to use free, widely available safety measures to store info and communicate."
The question, as Soghoian pointed out on his own site in a follow-up post, is that Google products aren't secure out of the box on purpose "because the company's business design is dependent on the monetization of user data, the company keeps as much info as practical about the actions of its users. These detailed notes aren't just useful to Google's engineers and advertising teams, but are also a mouth-watering target for law enforcement agencies." Vint Cerf, Google's "Chief Internet Evangelist" admitted latterly on a panel that "we couldn't run our system if everything in it were encrypted because then we wouldn't know which ads to show you. So this is a system that was designed around a particular business model."
This implies not only repressive regimes can more easily obtain access to your info but ID thieves and other black hat hackers can as well . Site after site asks for user names and passwords, many users repeating the same password, so that hacking one unsecure site suddenly opens every online account to theft and vandalism.
Shortage of Online Anonymity : Tied into the requirement to sell to advertisers is the rocketing refusal of web services to allow incognito users. "On the Net, No One Knows You are a Dog" -- once the standard joke about anonymity online -- has give way to a Large Brother-ish requirement for continued identity checks by online sites.
Google's need that only "real names" be used in online Google+ accounts is the most recent example of this, with MANAGING DIRECTOR Eric Schmidt admitting recently in an interview the reason is to make it an "identity service" to sell people things:. As Schmidt explained :
"if we knew that it was a genuine person, then we could kind of hold them accountable, we could check them, we could give them things, we could you know bill them, you know we could have visa cards and so forth."
"Apple and Google both seem enthusiastic about NFC technology (near-field communication)," writes, Mathew Ingram at the site Gigomon, "which turns portable gadgets into electronic wallets, and having a social network tied to an individual user's identity would come in handy."
This hard-line against anonymity means the viewpoints of political dissidents or employee whistleblowers who don't want their names revealed are actually silenced in such environments, all for the sake of making advertisers content and facilitating ecommerce by online corporations.
Bad Site Design : It is not as life-threatening a problem, but advertising drives web design (in Croatian translate web dizajn) that is repugnant, confusing and time-consuming for users. In order to maximise "page views" that can each hold advertising and generate advertising income, articles are parsed into multiple pages. The Columbia Journalism Review describes a similar "Faustian bargain" of the expansion of multiple-page "slide shows" to in a similar fashion generate multiple pages to generate ad greenbacks.
This is mixed with pages where advertisements dominate more and more display space, where as the Knight Digitised Media Center explains, ""As news distributors scrabble for money, advertisers have gained leverage to demand more--and more prominent--digital space. The ensuing ad-heavy homepages make business sense--but the result's visually 'appalling.'"
Bracing the "Tawdry" Side of Capitalism : Net visionary Jaron Lanier, who has been writing about the Net since before most people ever heard about its existence, disagrees that such identity-based appeals by firms gives advertising a terrible name. He disagreed in an interview a couple of months gone :
Google's thing is not advertising because it's not a romanticizing operation. It doesn't involve expression... It's a little tiny minimalist link, and essentially what they're selling is not advertising, they're not selling romance, they're not selling communication, what they're doing is selling access..."You give us cash, we give you access to these people, and then what you do with them is up to you."
Lanier observes that firms using such identity-based access are not generally from the "dignified side of capitalism" but rather "tend to be lots of ambulance chasers and snake oil salesmen."
So in pursuit of those low-road advertisers, we see many online data services building web sites that are less secure, less functional, uglier and enfeeble political freedom in the service of the needs of those advertisers.
An Alternative to Advertising : The upward push of paid applications has shown one option road where small payments by users encourage corporations to design services solely in the interests of users instead of 3rd party advertisers. Even services directly online frequently employ a "freemium" model that eschews advertising in favor of providing basic free services to any user, while gaining money from a smaller subset of users who like the service enough to pay a subscription to open more advanced features.
To urge that alternative of Net design solely In the interests of users, we need policy to better preserve user privacy so that no company can track or share user info without that user's direct opt-in to each use of their data. Clearer transactions around loss of user info to advertisers (and probably to hackers and ID thieves due to absence of security) will inspire more of those users to choose better-designed and safer paid alternatives as reported tagza.com.